Construct a grid in which you cross two TtIi individuals.
F1 = TtIi
Gametes T, t, I, i.
F2
TI Ti tI ti
TI TTII TTTi TtII TtIi
Ti TTIi TTii TtIi Ttii
tI TtII TtIi ttII ttIi
ti TtIi Ttii ttIi ttii
You cross the dwarf and tall plants and then self-cross the offspring. For best results, this is repeated with hundreds or even thousands of pea plants. What special precautions should be taken in the crosses and in growing the plants?
We should make sure that the F1 generation is allowed to self-pollinate. We should make sure that the F1 generation do not pollinate with a true breeding plant/pure breed pant.
You observe the following plant phenotypes in the F2 generation: 2706 tall/inflated, 930 tall/constricted, 888 dwarf/inflated, and 300 dwarf/constricted. Reduce these findings to a ratio and determine if they are consistent with Mendelian laws.
tall/inflated: tall/constricted: dwarf/inflated: dwarf/constricted in a 9:3:3:1 ratio
2706/300 = 9.02
930/300 = 3.1
888/300 = 2.96
300/300 = 1
9.02: 3.1: 2.96: 1
Our Ratio is consistent to Mendelian law.
Were the results close to the expected 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio? Do the results support the prediction? What might be observed if far fewer plants were used, given that alleles segregate randomly into gametes? Try to imagine growing that many pea plants, and consider the potential for experimental error. For instance, what would happen if it was extremely windy one day?
Yes, our results 9.02: 3.1: 2.96: 1 is close to the expected 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ration.
Yes our results support the prediction as our ratios are close to the expected one.
I don’t think anything could go wrong on a windy day if there are no true breeding plants around but it there are, the wind could carry the true breeding plant’s pollen and pollinate with the F1 generation and give errors in the results since the true breeding flowers won’t be TtIi. In accidents like these we would have to start the whole experiment over again, staring with two true breeding plants.
The Statue of Gudea and The Royal acquaintance of Memi and Sabu
The Statue of Gudea and The Royal acquaintance of Memi and Sabu Name University of the People The Statue of Gudea and The Royal acquaintance of Memi and Sabu According to the Cambridge dictionary, a Sculpture is “the art of forming solid objects that represent a thing, person, idea, etc. out of materials such as wood, clay, metal, or stone.". ‘Sculpture’ comes from the late 14c and is derived from the Latin word ‘sculptÅ«ra’ which means 'sculpt' (Sculpture, n.d.). Sculptures have always played a great role in the study of the past. They teach us about ancient lifestyles and religions. Most of the sculptures were made to represent the kings and Powerful personal of the time. although most of the ancient sculptures made of a perishable material such as wood have been disintegrated over time, However, Statues made of stronger materials such as stone and marble have survived long enough for us to study and preserve. Two of these statues that we will compare and cont...
Comments
Post a Comment